MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092638882 · doi:10.5020/2317-2150.2018.10383

Les Cours des Comptes et la tutelle environnementale

2020· article· fr· W3092638882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePensar - Revista de Ciências Jurídicas · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesOutragePhilosophyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Cours des Comptes du Brésil ont une nature juridique sui generis. Ce sont des organes autonomes et d’une haute importance dans le contexte juridique constitutionnel brésilien. Ils excercent la fonction d’“auxiliaire” au Pouvoir Législatif dans le contrôle des actes de la gestion publique. Ils ont une large compétence d’analyse dans le cadre de l’environnement, et peuvent vérifier des organes soumis à son contrôle leurs actions sous l’aspect de l’économie et de légitimité. Ces tribunaux possèdent en plus de cela des instruments des modes d’action préventives calqués sur les principes de prévention et de précaution qui justifient l’emploi de la tutelle inhibitoire, avec le but d’éviter l’occurrence de dégâts à l’environnement. C’est par le biais de prises de comptes spéciaux, de la non-exécution d’actes normatifs inconstitutionnels, du pouvoir général de protection et du terme d’adoption de providences que doivent agir de forme à inhiber tout outrage à l’environnement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.792
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it