Pengaruh Skenario dan Gambar Pada Film “Ayo Pulang Kampung” Terhadap Rasa Nasionalisme Mahasiswa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kreativitas para sineas di Indonesia dapat dikatakan masih statis, dilihat dari minimnya genre-genre film yang ada di tanah air. Kebanyakan genre film di Indonesia hanya seputar drama romantik, komedi, horor, dan seks yag inti ceritanya sama sekali tidak memiliki unsur edukasi (mendidik), jangan hanya kemasan di buat berbeda. Hal ini yang semakin mengurangi pudarny rasa nasionalisme masyarakat Indonesia khususnya dikalangan mahasiswa. Metode dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode deskriptif dan verifikatif, yakni hasil penelitian yang kemudian diolah dan diambil kesimpulan. Metode deskriptif untuk menggambarkan permasalahan dan metode verifikatif untuk mengetahui besarnya pengaruh rumusan masalah. Tentunya terdapat pengaruh antara skenario dan gambar pada rasa nasionalisme mahasiswa. Begitu juga antara skenario dan rasa nasionalisme mahasiswa. Berdasarkan pengujian hipotesis skenario dan gambar pada film "Ayo Pulang Kampung" memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap rasa nasionalisme mahasiswa brodcasting BSI Jakarta.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.039 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".