MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092681286 · doi:10.1155/2020/1318930

IFN-γ Correlations with Pain Assessment, Radiological Findings, and Clinical Intercourse in Patient after Lumbar Microdiscectomy: Preliminary Study

2020· article· en· W3092681286 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDisease Markers · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSciaticaMcGill Pain QuestionnaireOswestry Disability IndexRadicular painLumbarPhysical therapyBeck Depression InventoryLow back painRating scaleDepression (economics)Visual analogue scaleInternal medicineSurgeryAnxietyPathologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives. We investigated the influence of pain decrease after lumbar microdiscectomy on the interferon gamma (IFN-γ) serum level in patients with lumbar disc herniations. The study challenges the mechanism of sciatica pain and the role of IFN-γ in radicular pain development. Material and Methods. We performed clinical and immunoenzymatic assessment in a group of 27 patients with lumbar radicular pain due to disc herniations before and 3 months after surgery. Clinical status was assessed with the use of the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), the Pain Rating Index and Pain Intensity Index of McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Beck Depression Inventory (BDI). The plasma concentrations of IFN-γ were ascertained by an immunoenzymatic method. Results. We observe significant correlations between the results of the pain in the back region assessment NRS back scale after the surgery with the level of IFN-γ before the procedure ( <a:math xmlns:a="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M1"> <a:msub> <a:mrow> <a:mi>r</a:mi> </a:mrow> <a:mrow> <a:mi>s</a:mi> </a:mrow> </a:msub> <a:mo>=</a:mo> <a:mn>0.528</a:mn> </a:math> ; <c:math xmlns:c="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M2"> <c:mi>p</c:mi> <c:mo>=</c:mo> <c:mn>0.008</c:mn> </c:math> ) and after the procedure ( <e:math xmlns:e="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M3"> <e:msub> <e:mrow> <e:mi>r</e:mi> </e:mrow> <e:mrow> <e:mi>s</e:mi> </e:mrow> </e:msub> <e:mo>=</e:mo> <e:mn>0.455</e:mn> </e:math> ; <g:math xmlns:g="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M4"> <g:mi>p</g:mi> <g:mo>=</g:mo> <g:mn>0.025</g:mn> </g:math> ). These are moderate and positive correlations—the decrease in pain is correlated with the lower IFN-γ level. Additionally, there are significant correlations between the results of the PRI scale and the IFN-γ level. The PRI score before surgery correlates positively with IFN-γ after surgery ( <i:math xmlns:i="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M5"> <i:msub> <i:mrow> <i:mi>r</i:mi> </i:mrow> <i:mrow> <i:mi>s</i:mi> </i:mrow> </i:msub> <i:mo>=</i:mo> <i:mn>0.462</i:mn> </i:math> ; <k:math xmlns:k="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M6"> <k:mi>p</k:mi> <k:mo>=</k:mo> <k:mn>0.023</k:mn> </k:math> ), and the PRI score after surgery correlates positively with IFN before surgery ( <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M7"> <m:msub> <m:mrow> <m:mi>r</m:mi> </m:mrow> <m:mrow> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>0.529</m:mn> </m:math> ; <o:math xmlns:o="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M8"> <o:mi>p</o:mi> <o:mo>=</o:mo> <o:mn>0.005</o:mn> </o:math> ) and after surgery ( <q:math xmlns:q="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M9"> <q:msub> <q:mrow> <q:mi>r</q:mi> </q:mrow> <q:mrow> <q:mi>s</q:mi> </q:mrow> </q:msub> <q:mo>=</q:mo> <q:mn>0.549</q:mn> </q:math> ; <s:math xmlns:s="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M10"> <s:mi>p</s:mi> <s:mo>=</s:mo> <s:mn>0.003</s:mn> </s:math> ). All correlations are moderate in severity—severe pain before surgery correlates with a higher level of IFN-γ after surgery and also higher IFN-γ before surgery. There were significant differences in the IFN-γ level before ( <u:math xmlns:u="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M11"> <u:mi>Z</u:mi> <u:mo>=</u:mo> <u:mo>−</u:mo> <u:mn>2.733</u:mn> </u:math> ; <w:math xmlns:w="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M12"> <w:mi>p</w:mi> <w:mo>=</w:mo> <w:mn>0.006</w:mn> </w:math> ) and after ( <y:math xmlns:y="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M13"> <y:mi>Z</y:mi> <y:mo>=</y:mo> <y:mo>−</y:mo> <y:mn>2.391</y:mn> </y:math> ; <ab:math xmlns:ab="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" id="M14"> <ab:mi>p</ab:mi> <ab:mo>=</ab:mo> <ab:mn>0.017</ab:mn> </ab:math> ) surgery in the groups of patients with and without nerve compression. In the group of patients with nerve compression, the level of IFN-γ before and after surgery was lower. Conclusions. Less pain ratio after operation correlates with the level of IFN-γ. In the group of patients without significant nerve compression confirmed by MRI scans, the level of IFN-γ before and after surgery was higher than that in the group with nerve root compression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.527

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it