MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092702109 · doi:10.7202/1069878ar

Trois oeuvres musicales québécoises marquantes, diffusées quotidiennement sur le site de l’Exposition universelle de Montréal en 1967

2020· article· fr· W3092702109 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Jean Boivin, Patrick Hébert

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musique · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En 1967, année du centenaire de la Confédération canadienne, la tenue à Montréal d’une grande Exposition universelle internationale (« Expo 67 ») a permis à maints compositeurs québécois et canadiens d’atteindre un public large et varié. Trois oeuvres particulièrement marquantes ont été diffusées quotidiennement à l’intérieur de pavillons de l’Exposition. Tandis que Serge Garant concevait une musique de film pour le pavillon thématique L’homme et les régions polaires (oeuvre instrumentale qui deviendra un an plus tard Amuya), Gilles Tremblay réalisait la sonorisation du pavillon du Québec et Otto Joachim créait dans son studio privé l’oeuvre Katimavik, destinée au pavillon du Canada mais diffusée en plein air et entièrement élaborée à partir de sons électroniques. Différents documents montrent que ces trois oeuvres, d’une esthétique indéniablement moderne, ont été conçues en fonction d’un contexte et d’un espace public très particulier, et que leur impact sur le grand public et la critique fut considérable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.072
Threshold uncertainty score0.186

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0130.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0500.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLes Cahiers de la Société québécoise de recherche en musiqueSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207