MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092728195 · doi:10.20381/ruor-25364

Professional Sports Teams, CSR and Community Development: An Examination of the Montreal Canadiens Bleu, Blanc, Bouge Project

2020· dissertation· en· W3092728195 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jean-Marc Adjizian

Bibliographic record

VenueuO Research (University of Ottawa) · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicNonprofit Sector and Volunteering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCorporate social responsibilityPolitical scienceLibrary sciencePublic relationsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is paradoxically observable, in this era of hypermodernity characterized by an expansion of individualism, capitalism and economic, political and cultural globalization, an increasing importance of the concept of community. It is necessary to understand the relationship between corporations and communities, mainly in a market-led world. While corporations have been gaining power since the advent of modern society, communities have been losing their autonomy and becoming more and more dependent on exogenous actors such as state and corporations. This dissertation has four objectives. It allows the examination of the relationship between the Montreal Canadiens Children’s Foundation’s Bleu, Blanc, Bouge (BBB) program, CSR and: 1) the three environments that constitute a community (i.e. cultural, social and spatial); 2) social identity; 3) solidarity; 4) agency. From a theoretical point of view, this research is important because it responds two criticisms that can be made in the areas of CSR and community development. Unlike studies in the area of CSR, this research does not aim to understand the impact of these programs on business, but rather on the community as a whole. From a community point of view, this study goes beyond the bottom-up paradigm and critical theories towards the private sector in an attempt to understand the influence that this sector can have on the community and its development through CSR initiatives. In order to meet the initial objectives, this research is based on a qualitative case study methodology: the BBB program. Three communities having obtained this program will be studied. Data collection was done through a method of semi-structured interviews with local actors and administrators of the foundation. The questions were about the development of the BBB project and its acquisition process by the communities, the cultural, social and built environments of the communities, and about the management strategies of the facility. Findings allowed us to understand that the Montreal Canadiens Children’s foundation is positively perceived by the local communities because of its closeness with the professional hockey team that is an important figure in the social landscape of Montreal and that was helping local communities long before the creation of its foundation. As for the BBB program, results show that its success is reliant on the fact that it follows the proven strategies of community development such as answering a local need and mobilizing multiple local actors. However, findings also put forward that some negative impacts can occur from this project such as the enhancement of resources in order to manage the facility. With regard to the cultural, social and spatial environments that constitute a community, findings show that the BBB program easily integrates the local cultural environment, but also provokes some changes in the local cultures. As for the spatial environment, the BBB program allows the receiving communities to propose a high-quality equipment to their population that they could not afford alone. Moreover, the BBB rinks reinforce local leisure accessibility, become a development driver for the entire park in which they are located and seem to have a large effect on the neighbourhood. Finally, in regard to social environment, the BBB program participate in the inclusion of vulnerable populations, becomes a gathering spot for youth, enhances local pride, contributes to the revival of the neighbourhood, and helps the creation of new partnerships. However, it can also create a financial burden that communities can hardly bear. This research demonstrates that the relationship between a CSR initiative and the community and its development can be positive at some level. It shows that CSR carried out by professional sport teams and based on proven community development strategies has more chances to succeed. However, such initiatives will always have negative effects on communities. In order to deepen our understanding of the relationship between CSR and communities, future studies should explore how other types of CSR initiatives interact with the identity, solidarity and agency of a community, how CSR initiatives enter into relationships with communities having different cultural and socio-political contexts and how such initiatives impact the communities on the long-term.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.005
Science and technology studies0.0190.009
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0030.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueuO Research (University of Ottawa)Same topicNonprofit Sector and VolunteeringFrench-language works237,207