Un recorrido por "La mujer nueva" y las cartas del Memch: Alianzas y demandas en el marco de la emancipación de las mujeres en Chile
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following paper proposes a critical survey on the legacy of the Chilean Women’s Pro Emancipation Movement (MEMCH) through the analysis of their letters and main publication, La Mujer Nueva newspaper, during the first half of the twentieth century in Chile. We seek to reveal the alliances behind this all-female institution, as well as delve into their demands and the purpose of their struggle through the words expressed by members and leaders alike. Given the general scarcity of public women’s testimonies during the first half of the twentieth century in the country, this corpus of letters and articles is a particularly interesting and relevant piece of Chilean literary and journalistic history. Through the analysis of these texts we can attest to the common imaginaries’ Chilean women from all social and economic backgrounds shared, both in terms of objectives to reach, as well as challenges to tackle. We will seek to shed light on these issues from the theoretical standpoint of Carol Gilligan’s “ethics of care” and Miguel Abensour’s “education of desire”, focusing in the affective strategies deployed by Chilean women to reach their ideal of creating a “new woman” for Chile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".