MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092917919 · doi:10.3390/w12102858

Improved δ-SPH Scheme with Automatic and Adaptive Numerical Dissipation

2020· article· en· W3092917919 on OpenAlexaff
Abdelkader Krimi, Luis Ramírez, Sofiane Khelladi, F. Navarrina, Michaël Deligant, Xesús Nogueira

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics Simulations and Interactions
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
FundersXunta de GaliciaConsellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, Xunta de GaliciaMinisterio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
KeywordsDissipationSmoothed-particle hydrodynamicsRobustness (evolution)CompressibilityScheme (mathematics)Computer simulationApplied mathematicsMechanicsNumerical analysisKinetic energyFlow (mathematics)Kinetic schemeStatistical physicsComputer scienceMathematicsClassical mechanicsPhysicsMathematical analysisThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we present a δ-Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH) scheme for weakly compressible flows with automatic adaptive numerical dissipation. The resulting scheme is a meshless self-adaptive method, in which the introduced artificial dissipation is designed to increase the dissipation in zones where the flow is under-resolved by the numerical scheme, and to decrease it where dissipation is not required. The accuracy and robustness of the proposed methodology is tested by solving several numerical examples. Using the proposed scheme, we are able to recover the theoretical decay of kinetic energy, even where the flow is under-resolved in very coarse particle discretizations. Moreover, compared with the original δ-SPH scheme, the proposed method reduces the number of problem-dependent parameters.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaterSame topicFluid Dynamics Simulations and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207