MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3092934971 · doi:10.31933/jimt.v1i6.209

PENGARUH WABAH COVID-19 TERHADAP TINGKAT PENGANGGURAN TERBUKA PADA SEKTOR TERDAMPAK DI INDONESIA

2020· article· en· W3092934971 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Layli Eksak Agustiana

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Ilmu Manajemen Terapan · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCOVID-19 Prevention and Impact
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndonesianUnemploymentTourismChristian ministryCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Unemployment rateBusinessQuarter (Canadian coin)GeographySocioeconomicsEconomic growthPolitical scienceEconomicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covid-19 pandemic which took place since the beginning of the year has hit the economy, including in Indonesia. The business sectors, especially tourism and manufacturing are the most affected. The result is the termination of employment (layoffs) or laying off workers for a while. Based on data from the Ministry of Manpower and BPJS Employment, there are 2.8 million workers directly affected by Covid-19. They consist of 1.7 million formal workers laying off and 749.4 thousand laid off. In addition, there were 282 informal workers whose businesses were disrupted. While the Badan Perlindungan Pekerja Migran Indonesia (BP2MI) recorded that there were 100,094 Pekerja Migran Indonesia (PMI) from 83 countries returning to Indonesia in the last three months. CORE Indonesia estimates that the open unemployment rate in the second quarter of 2020 will reach 8.2% with a mild scenario. While other scenarios were 9.79% in the medium scenario and 11.47% were severe scenarios. The Indonesian Monetary Fund (IMF) also projects Indonesia's unemployment rate in 2020 to be 7.5%, increasing from 2019 which is only 5.3%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.068
GPT teacher head0.364
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Ilmu Manajemen TerapanSame topicCOVID-19 Prevention and ImpactFrench-language works237,207