Sex differences in underweight and body mass index in Chinese early de novo patients with Parkinson's disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: There have been studies investigating sex differences in clinical manifestation of Parkinson's disease (PD). However, sex differences in underweight and body mass index (BMI) in de novo PD patients lacked systematic study. We aimed to compare sex differences in clinical features and related factors of underweight and BMI in Chinese de novo PD patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 253 untreated PD inpatients and 218 controls were recruited from Ningbo. BMI, demographics, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), supine and upright blood pressure, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD), homocysteine (HCY), uric acid, glycated hemoglobin, and lipid parameters were examined. Patients were assessed using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor scores and Hoehn and Yahr (HY) Rating Scale. RESULTS: Female patients had a significantly lower incidence of underweight and higher BMI than male patients, and there were sex differences in serum lipids, HCY levels, and depression severity. Binary regression analysis showed that only in male patients was underweight associated with the UPDRS motor score and lower ΔSBP and ΔDBP values (all p < .05). Further multiple regression analysis indicated, in addition to the correlations between BMI and ΔSBP and ΔDBP values in both sexes (all p < .001), BMI was also associated with MoCA and lower UPDRS motor scores in male patients and lower HAMD scores in female patients. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that there are significant sex differences in the prevalence of underweight, BMI, and factors associated with underweight and BMI among de novo PD patients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it