MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093057730 · doi:10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e00990

Moxibustion-septic shock and necrotizing fasciitis

2020· article· en· W3093057730 on OpenAlex
Harnek Singh, Amardeep Singh Chetha, Hamed Shalikar

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIDCases · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStreptococcal Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsWorkers Compensation Board of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMoxibustionMedicineFasciitisSeptic shockAcupunctureVietnameseMeridian (astronomy)Intensive care medicineTraditional medicineSurgeryDermatologyAlternative medicinePathologySepsis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moxibustion is a traditional Chinese treatment that has been utilized for centuries. It also plays an important role in traditional Korean, Vietnamese, Japanese and Mongolian medicine. It is considered safe by practitioners of Alternative Medicine, similar to acupuncture treatment, and consists of burning plant materials called "moxa" on or very near the surface of the skin near meridian points. Traditional practitioners believe that it can be effective against chronic conditions and improve blood in one's body. However, Moxibustion is not without risk to the patient. This case report describes a case of a patient whose moxibustion treatment led to septic shock secondary to necrotizing fasciitis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.360

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it