Bibliographic record
Abstract
La fabrique d’une loi. Retour sur la « grande ordonnance de réforme de 1254 »Célèbre et célébrée par l’historiographie, la « grande » ordonnance de 1254, ensemble de prescriptions édictées par Louis IX en vue de moraliser son administration locale et, au-delà, le royaume tout entier, est un monument normatif dont on connaît mal la fabrique, à l’image de l’ensemble de la production normative de la France du xiiie siècle. Dans la lignée des travaux menés depuis 2010 sur l’écriture de la loi au Moyen Âge, cet article, entièrement consacré à la célèbre ordonnance, entend proposer une micro-histoire de la production législative à une époque où le Parlement et la Chambre des Comptes, principales chambres d’enregistrement de la loi aux siècles suivants, se détachent à peine de la curia regis. Sont ainsi mis au jour les multiples phases de rédaction de cette loi, sa diffusion, son enregistrement, sa conservation, ses sources, ses auteurs, de même que les mécanismes qui aboutirent à sa promulgation et à sa monumentalisation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.021 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".