MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3093101498 · doi:10.1101/2020.10.14.20212589

Physiological and psychosocial correlates of cancer related fatigue

2020· preprint· en· W3093101498 on OpenAlexaff
Callum G. Brownstein, Rosie Twomey, John Temesi, James G. Wrightson, Tristan Martin, Mary E. Medysky, S. Nicole Culos‐Reed, Guillaume Y. Millet

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2020
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer survivorship and care
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCancer-related fatigueCardiorespiratory fitnessPsychosocialMedicineCancerVO2 maxAnthropometryInternal medicinePhysical therapyBlood pressureHeart ratePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a common and distressing symptom of cancer and its treatments that may persist for years following treatment completion in approximately one-third of cancer survivors. Despite its high prevalence, little is known about the pathophysiology of CRF. Using a comprehensive group of physiological and psychosocial variables, the aim of the present study was to identify correlates of CRF in a heterogenous group of cancer survivors. Ninety-three cancer survivors (51 fatigued, 42 non-fatigued, with grouping based on validated cut-off scores derived from The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue scale) completed assessments of performance fatigability (i.e. the change in maximal force-generating capacity, contractile function and capacity of the central nervous system to activate muscles caused by cycling exercise), cardiopulmonary exercise testing, venous blood samples for whole blood cell count and inflammatory markers and body composition. Participants also completed questionnaires measuring demographic, treatment-related, and psychosocial variables. The results showed that performance fatigability (decline in muscle strength during exercise), time-to-task-failure, peak oxygen uptake , tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), body fat percentage and lean mass index were associated with CRF severity. Performance fatigability, , TNF-α and age explained 35% of the variance in CRF severity. Furthermore, those with clinically-relevant CRF reported more pain, more depressive symptoms, less social support, and were less physically active than non-fatigued cancer survivors. Given the association between CRF and numerous physical activity related measures, including performance fatigability, cardiorespiratory fitness, and anthropometric measures, the present study identifies potential biomarkers by which the mechanisms underpinning the effect of physical activity interventions on CRF can be investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicCancer survivorship and care→French-language works237,207→