MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093143299 · doi:10.51656/psycause.v10i1.30454

Portrait des conséquences associées aux maltraitances infantiles intrafamiliales à partir d'une recension d'écrits scientifiques

2020· article· fr· W3093143299 on OpenAlex
Iliona Wattel

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenuePsycause revue scientifique étudiante de l École de psychologie de l Université Laval · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les maltraitances infantiles intrafamiliales, par leur prévalence élevée au sein de notre société, constituent un problème majeur de santé publique. Toutefois, elles restent encore trop souvent tues, voire niées, alors que leurs conséquences sont pourtant bien présentes. Cet article a pour but de sensibiliser à l’importance de ces conséquences à travers une recension des écrits à ce sujet. Dans un premier temps, les maltraitances physiques, psychologiques et sexuelles, ainsi que la négligence seront définies et leur impact au sein de la famille sera expliqué. Les conséquences du trauma seront abordées, entre autres quant aux manifestations infantiles, aux comportements à risque et aux troubles psychologiques chez l’adolescent. Enfin, la recension portera aussi sur l’impact des maltraitances infantiles dans les différentes sphères de la vie de l’adulte, ainsi que sur la résilience et la survivance des symptômes liés aux maltraitances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.309
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it