MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093168791 · doi:10.1002/mp.14534

MRI to C‐arm spine registration through Pseudo‐3D CycleGANs with differentiable histograms

2020· article· en· W3093168791 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustinePolytechnique Montréal
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceImage registrationSørensen–Dice coefficientComputer visionVoxelSegmentationImage (mathematics)Image segmentation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Image-guided spine surgery increasingly relies on diagnostic MRI for device navigation, as it allows to visualize the nerves and soft tissues during screw insertion in the pedicle region, which is not possible with preoperative CT or cone beam CT. However, registration of MRI to C-arm images remains difficult due to differences in visible tissue. METHODS: In this paper, we introduce a three-dimensional/two-dimensional (3D/2D) registration method of preoperative T2-weighted MRI of the lumbar spine to C-arm X-ray using synthetic CT images. The registration work is based on a pseudo-3D CycleGAN integrating a new cyclic loss function to ensure consistency in MRI and CT synthesis using differentiable histograms to match the multimodal distributions. The unified framework allows to improve bony tissue inference as opposed to regular 2D CycleGAN for image synthesis. A multiplanar digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) registration approach aligns the 3D and 2D images. RESULTS: Experiments performed on a public dataset of 18 pathological spines yielded a mean dice coefficient of 0.84 ± 0.015 on synthetic CTs. The DRR registration experiments, on the other hand, presented a target localization error of 2.1 ± 0.2mm. CONCLUSION: Intensity distributions and voxel-wise errors in Hounsfield units show encouraging results, illustrating the network's flexibility of producing qualitatively and quantitatively reasonable synthetic CT scans that can be used in a surgical 3D/2D registration framework. These promising results demonstrate the potential of the synthesis tool prior to integration in an image-guidance system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.972
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it