MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093189544 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2020349

Asymptotic stability of viscous contact wave for the inflow problem of the one-dimensional radiative Euler equations

2020· article· en· W3093189544 on OpenAlexaff
Lili Fan, Lizhi Ruan, Wei Xiang

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInflowDiscontinuity (linguistics)Radiative transferEuler equationsMathematicsDegenerate energy levelsMathematical analysisPhysicsEuler's formulaBoundary value problemMechanicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is devoted to the study of the inflow problem governed by the radiative Euler equations in the one-dimensional half space. We establish the unique global-in-time existence and the asymptotic stability of the viscous contact discontinuity solution. It is different from the case involved with the rarefaction wave for the inflow problem in our previous work [ 6 ], since the rarefaction wave is a nonlinear expansive wave, while the contact discontinuity wave is a linearly degenerate diffusive wave. So we need to take good advantage of properties of the viscous contact discontinuity wave instead. Moreover, series of tricky argument on the boundary is done carefully based on the construction and the properties of the viscous contact discontinuity wave for the radiative Euler equations. Our result shows that radiation contributes to the stabilization effect for the supersonic inflow problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical SystemsSame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207