MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093189897 · doi:10.21037/qims-20-758

Live feedback and 3D photoacoustic remote sensing

2020· article· en· W3093189897 on OpenAlexaff
Saad Abbasi, Kevan Bell, Benjamin R. Ecclestone, Parsin Haji Reza

Bibliographic record

VenueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging
Canadian institutionsIllumisonics (Canada)University of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrame rateOpticsGalvanometerComputer scienceScannerMaterials scienceReflection (computer programming)ConfocalPhotoacoustic imaging in biomedicineImaging phantomMicroscopeLaserComputer visionArtificial intelligencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: As photoacoustic (PA) techniques progress towards clinical adoption, providing a high-speed live feedback becomes a high priority. To keep up with the instantaneous optical feedback of conventional light microscopes, PA imaging would need to provide a high-resolution video-rate live feed to the user. However, conventional PA microscopy typically trades resolution, sensitivity and imaging speed when optically scanning due to the difficult opto-acoustic confocal geometry. Here, we employ photoacoustic remote sensing (PARS), an all-optical technique that relies on optical confocal geometry, to provide a high-resolution live display in a reflection-mode PA architecture. Methods: Employing a conventional x-y galvanometer scanner and a 600 KHz pulse repetition rate laser we implement a system capable of acquiring 2.5 frames per second in 2D. To complement this fast scanning optical system, we implement a computationally inexpensive image reconstruction method that is able to render the frames with minimal overhead, providing a live display. Results: Employing the proposed method, we demonstrate a live feedback with frame rates as high as 2.5 Hz in 2D and also report the first results of 3D imaging with a non-contact label-free reflection-mode technique. The method is validated with phantom studies and in-vivo imaging. Employing a repetition rate of 600 KHz, a live feed of carbon fibers is realized with a C-scan rate of 2.5 Hz. The imaging resolution was measured to be 1.2 µm, the highest reported for a real-time reflection-mode architecture. The mean and peak SNR were measured to be 44 and 62 dB respectively in-vivo. 3D visualizations of carbon fiber phantoms and mouse ear microvasculature structure are also demonstrated. Conclusions: In summary, we present a method that has a small computational overhead for image rendering, resulting in a live display capable of real-time frame rates. We also report the first 3D imaging with a non-contact label-free reflection-mode PA technique. The all-optical confocal geometry required by PARS is significantly easier to implement and maintain than the opto-acoustic geometry of conventional PA microscopy techniques. This results in a system capable of high resolution and sensitivity, imaging at real-time rates. The authors believe this work represents a vital step towards a clinical high-resolution reflection-mode video-rate PA imaging system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQuantitative Imaging in Medicine and SurgerySame topicPhotoacoustic and Ultrasonic ImagingFrench-language works237,207