Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder Based on Functional Brain Networks with Deep Learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a neurological and developmental disorder. Traditional diagnosis of ASD is typically performed through the observation of behaviors and interview of a patient. However, these diagnosis methods are time-consuming and can be misleading sometimes. Integrating machine learning algorithms with neuroimages, a diagnosis method, can possibly be established to detect ASD subjects from typical control subjects. In this study, we develop deep learning methods for diagnosis of ASD from functional brain networks constructed with brain functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. The entire Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange 1 (ABIDE 1) data set is utilized to investigate the performance of our proposed methods. First, we construct the brain networks from brain fMRI images and define the raw features based on such brain networks. Second, we employ an autoencoder (AE) to learn the advanced features from the raw features. Third, we train a deep neural network (DNN) with the advanced features, which achieves the classification accuracy of 76.2% and the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 79.7%. As a comparison, we also apply the same advanced features to train several traditional machine learning algorithms to benchmark the classification performance. Finally, we combine the DNN with the pretrained AE and train it with the raw features, which achieves the classification accuracy of 79.2% and the AUC of 82.4%. These results show that our proposed deep learning methods outperform the state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".