MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093226677 · doi:10.1530/biosciprocs.18.0034

Responses to exogenous gonadotrophin treatment in contemporary weaned sows

2020· article· en· W3093226677 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer Patterson, A. Colin Cameron, T. F. Smith, Aline Kummer, R. G. Schott, Laura L Greiner, J. Connor, G. R. Foxcroft

Bibliographic record

VenueBioscientifica Proceedings · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnimal scienceInternal medicineEndocrinologyBiologyMedicinePhysiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The principal goal of commercial breeding herds is to consistently meet weekly breeding targets. Weaned sows failing to return to estrus within 7 d after weaning contribute to missed breeding targets and increased non-productive sow days. Treatment with low doses of exogenous gonadotrophins (GT) has traditionally been used to advance and synchronize estrus in weaned primiparous sows. However, in well managed contemporary commercial sow farms, more than 90% of sows may return to estrus within 7 d after weaning, posing questions about the likely efficacy of exogenous GT treatment. Therefore, the primary objective of the present study was to determine the response to GT treatment at weaning in contemporary parity 1 commercial sows with lactation lengths typical of the North American swine industry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.910
Threshold uncertainty score0.957

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.127 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBioscientifica ProceedingsSame topicAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesFrench-language works237,207