Sex‐differences in network level brain dynamics associated with pain sensitivity and pain interference
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Neural dynamics can shape human experience, including pain. Pain has been linked to dynamic functional connectivity within and across brain regions of the dynamic pain connectome (consisting of the ascending nociceptive pathway (Asc), descending antinociceptive pathway (Desc), salience network (SN), and the default mode network (DMN)), and also shows sex differences. These linkages are based on fMRI-derived slow hemodynamics. Here, we utilized the fine temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography (MEG) to measure resting state functional coupling (FCp) related to individual pain perception and pain interference in 50 healthy individuals (26 women, 24 men). We found that pain sensitivity and pain interference were linked to within- and cross-network broadband FCp across the Asc and SN. We also identified sex differences in these relationships: (a) women exhibited greater within-network static FCp, whereas men had greater dynamic FCp within the dynamic pain connectome; (b) relationship between pain sensitivity and pain interference with FCp in women was commonly found in theta, whereas in men, these relationships were predominantly in the beta and low gamma bands. These findings indicate that dynamic interactions of brain networks underlying pain involve fast brain communication in men but slower communication in women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.040 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".