MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093304125 · doi:10.2147/oas.s262825

<p>Pyloromyotomy in Hypertrophic Pyloric Stenosis: A Comparative Study Between Supraumbilical Curved Skin Incision and Standard (Right Upper Quadrant) Skin Incision: Study in a Resource Limited Setting</p>

2020· article· en· W3093304125 on OpenAlex
Mehran Peyvasteh, Shahnam Askarpour, Mahmoud Khoshkhabar, Hazhir Javaherizadeh

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Access Surgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntestinal Malrotation and Obstruction Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAhvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
KeywordsMedicinePyloromyotomyHypertrophic Pyloric StenosisSurgeryQuadrant (abdomen)AnatomyPylorusInternal medicineStomach

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: The main therapeutic option for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis (HPS) is pyloromyotomy surgical technique which can be performed via different methods, including right upper quadrant (RUQ) transverse incision and supraumbilical curved skin incision; thus, the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare clinical efficacy of supraumbilical curved skin incision and standard (RUQ) skin incision. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 35 patients with HPS were initially evaluated. After evaluating hospital records, 31 patients with completed hospital records were included: 9 from case group and 22 from control group. Demographic information, surgery parameters and postoperative complications were extracted from the hospital records or calling parents. Results: Results showed that the surgery parameters such as surgery duration (P=0.211), postoperative fasting duration (P=0.831), and hospitalization duration (P=0.521) in both groups were similar. Moreover, surgery complications such as duodenal or gastric perforation and surgical site infection did not differ between the groups (P> 0.05). While we found that Vancouver Scar Scale was significantly lower in supraumbilical curved skin incision as compared to control group (1.8 ± 0.5 vs 5.1 ± 0.7, P< 0.001, respectively). Conclusion: The results of this study showed the beneficial effects of supraumbilical curved skin incision technique on surgery scar outcomes and gives best cosmetic results with minimal complications, which could be replaced to RUQ operative technique and significantly lead to better control of surgery scar. Keywords: hypertrophic pyloric stenosis, supraumbilical curved skin incision, right upper quadrant transverse incision

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it