Latent Vector Recovery of Audio GANs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Advanced Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) are remarkable in generating intelligible audio from a random latent vector. In this paper, we examine the task of recovering the latent vector of both synthesized and real audio. Previous works recovered latent vectors of given audio through an auto-encoder inspired technique that trains an encoder network either in parallel with the GAN or after the generator is trained. With our approach, we train a deep residual neural network architecture to project audio synthesized by WaveGAN into the corresponding latent space with near identical reconstruction performance. To accommodate for the lack of an original latent vector for real audio, we optimize the residual network on the perceptual loss between the real audio samples and the reconstructed audio of the predicted latent vectors. In the case of synthesized audio, the Mean Squared Error (MSE) between the ground truth and recovered latent vector is minimized as well. We further investigated the audio reconstruction performance when several gradient optimization steps are applied to the predicted latent vector. Through our deep neural network based method of training on real and synthesized audio, we are able to predict a latent vector that corresponds to a reasonable reconstruction of real audio. Even though we evaluated our method on WaveGAN, our proposed method is universal and can be applied to any other GANs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".