MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093338810 · doi:10.1002/mds.28276

N‐Terminal Pro‐B‐Type Natriuretic Peptide Levels in Parkinson's Disease

2020· letter· en· W3093338810 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mariana Alves, Daniel Caldeira, Sofia Reimão, José M. Ferro, Joaquim J. Ferreira

Bibliographic record

VenueMovement Disorders · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubclinical infectionParkinson's diseaseInternal medicineNatriuretic peptideMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentPopulationRating scaleDiseasePhysical therapyCardiologyPsychologyDementiaHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest the study by Choe and colleagues1 who increases emphasis on the heart–brain axis in Parkinson's disease (PD). They have studied the relation between subclinical cardiac markers and motor impairment (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III and Hoehn and Yahr stage) and cognition (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]) concluding that (1) patients with PD presented higher levels of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) compared with healthy controls matched for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors; (2) increased levels of NT-proBNP and high-sensitivity troponin I were associated with worse motor impairment (Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III and Hoehn and Yahr stage); and (3) MoCA was inversely associated to high-sensitivity troponin I and NT-proBNP levels only in unadjusted models among patients with PD.1 The population included were patients with advanced-stage PD (12 years of disease duration in average).1 We have replicated these analyses in an independent population of patients with earlier stage PD (age 66 ± 9 years old, 56% male, disease duration 4.2 ± 2.62 years, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale Part III 24.5 ± 9.31) being evaluated for cardiovascular risk factors. We conducted a case-control study comparing patients with PD with non-PD controls. Patients with PD were recruited sequentially from the Movement Disorders Unit of the University Hospital of Santa Maria-Lisbon, and controls were recruited from 1 general practitioner list from a primary healthcare center in the same geographic region. All patients were diagnosed with PD by a movement disorders specialist according to the UK PD Brain Bank criteria2 and had <11 years of disease duration. Controls were randomly selected from a general practitioner's list of patients and matched to the patients with PD according to age and gender. All participants were evaluated by an internal medicine physician and movement disorders expert. Blood samples were taken and the MoCA test was performed by a trained nurse. Dysautonomy/orthostatic hypotension was defined as the decline of at least 20 mmHg in systolic blood pressure and/or 10 mmHg in diastolic blood pressure within 5 minutes of going from supine to standing. Participants with heart failure were excluded. All comparisons between patients with PD and matched controls did not reach significance (Table 1). In our analysis of the NT-proBNP marker among patients with PD, we only found higher significant results when comparing patients with PD with and without orthostatic hypotension (254 ng/L vs. 135 ng/L; P = 0.028). We also did not find a significant association of NT-proBNP with motor impairment or MoCA test in patients with PD. 158 ± 214 ng/mL (5; 1141) 143 ± 272 ng/mL (14; 1941) 135.3 ± 252.6 ng/mL (n = 89)**** P value = 0.44. Although our results are not conclusive, they go in the same direction of the conclusions of Choe and colleagues. The purpose of this letter is to add to the discussion the possibility that this association between subclinical cardiac markers and PD should be explored even at an earlier stage of the disease. (1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution(2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript Preparation: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique. M.A.: 1A, 2A, 2B, 2C, 3A, 3B D.C.: 2A, 2B, 2C, 3B S.R.: 2C, 3B J.M.F.: 1A, 2C, 3B J.J.F.: 1A, 1B, 2A, 2C, 3B Dr Alves was awarded a scholarship from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/129700/2017); reports she has participated in educational meetings and/or attended conferences or symposia with Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Grünenthal,Tecnimede, Merck Sharp & Dohme. Prof Caldeira reports that he has participated in educational meetings and/or attended conferences or symposia with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Bayer, Boheringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono, Ferrer, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. Profª Reimão has nothing to report. Prof Ferro reports honoraria for speaker, clinical trial coordinator and advisory board from Boehringer Ingelheim. Prof. Ferreira has held consultancy functions with GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, TEVA, Lundbeck, Solvay, Abbott, Abbvie, BIAL, Merck-Serono, Merz, Ipsen, Biogen, NeuroDerm, Zambon, Sunovion, Affiris, ONO; has received lecture fees from Biogen and BIAL, Sunovion, ONO, Zambon, Abbvie; has received grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Grunenthal, MSD, Allergan, Novartis, Fundação MSD (Portugal), Medtronic and Teva; has been employed by Faculdade de Medicina de Lisboa and CNS – Campus Neurológico Sénior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.158
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMovement DisordersSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207