MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The WTI Crude Negative Pricing

2020· article· en· W3093380012 on OpenAlexaff
Serah Sudhin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Foreign Trade and International Business · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEconomic Growth and Development
Canadian institutionsHorizon College and Seminary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWest Texas IntermediateFutures contractCrude oilCommodityEconomicsFinancial economicsCommerceBusinessEconomic historyMarket economyEngineeringPetroleum engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crude Oil is and was the most coveted commodity in the world, as it is the engine of transport, manufacturing and other ancillary industries. Can you imagine snoozing off on April 17th 2020 and waking up on April 20th 2020, only to find that this commodity has become the seller's Crimean curse? For starters, the Corona Virus clamped all economic and social activity, halting all semblance of the industrial 21st century, during the lock down that has extended for more than two months. Its during this unprecedented phase, that all economic wisdom came screeching to a halt. Stay with me through the course of the article to understand what happened to the WTI Crude April Futures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.864
Threshold uncertainty score0.400

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Foreign Trade and International BusinessSame topicEconomic Growth and DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207