MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093522193 · doi:10.36487/acg_repo/1074_24

Development of a fully debonded cone bolt for rockburst support

2010· article· en· W3093522193 on OpenAlexafffund
Ming Cai, D. Champaigne, Peter K. Kaiser

Bibliographic record

VenueDeep mining · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical and Geomechanical Engineering
Canadian institutionsHudbay Minerals (Canada)Centre for Excellence in Mining InnovationLaurentian University
FundersGoldcorp
KeywordsCone (formal languages)GroutStructural engineeringRock boltMaterials scienceBoreholeGeologyComputer scienceComposite materialGeotechnical engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The development of cone bolts is briefly reviewed in this paper. It was found that local bonding between the bolt and the grout can prevent the cone from moving and effectively absorbing dynamic energy. To solve the debonding issue and provide consistent performance of modified cone bolts (MCB), we developed a new patented debonding agent in the form of a plastic sleeve installed over the shaft of the cone bolt. Dynamic and static laboratory testing combined with in situ pull tests confirmed the new system's functionality. Drop tests confirmed that this new debonding agent is much more effective than grease used in the original cone bolt design. In addition, the new cone bolt is designed for 33 mm boreholes and thus can be used in a onepass rock support system to facilitate rapid drift development in underground mines. The new fully debonded MCB33 cone bolt is characterised by higher dynamic energy absorption capacity, consistent performance, and the ability to withstand repeated impacts from sequential rockburst events.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDeep miningSame topicGeotechnical and Geomechanical EngineeringFrench-language works237,207