One-year outcomes of stand-alone ab externo SIBS microshunt implantation in refractory glaucoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Determine the efficacy of stand-alone implantation of the ab externo SIBS or poly(styrene-block-isobutylene-block-styrene) microshunt with mitomycin C in glaucomatous eyes, refractory to previous subconjunctival filtering surgery, over 1 year of follow-up. METHODS: Consecutive retrospective cohort of patients with intraocular pressure (IOP) above target and previous subconjunctival filtering surgery, who received the microshunt between July 2015 and April 2019. Primary outcome was a complete success, with failure defined as IOP <6 mm Hg with vision loss, >17 mm Hg or <20% reduction in IOP without medications. Secondary outcomes included thresholds of 6 to 14 mm Hg and 6 to 21 mm Hg for both complete (no medications) and qualified (with medications) success as well as qualified success for thresholds of 6 to 17 mm Hg. Risk factors for failure, IOP, medications and complications were also assessed. RESULTS: 85 eyes of 79 patients with a preoperative median IOP of 22.0 mm Hg (IQR 18.0-29.0) on four (IQR 3-4) medications were included. Postoperative median IOP was 13.0 mm Hg (IQR 10.0-17.0) on zero (IQR 0-2) medication at 1 year. 61.0% achieved complete success and 79.7% achieved qualified success. Mild-to-moderate disease was associated with failure (adjusted HR 2.37; 95% CI 1.23 to 4.59). Needling was performed in 11.8%, and 8.2% underwent anterior chamber reformation. Complications were transient, consisting of hyphaema, choroidal detachment and hypotony maculopathy, with 7.1% of patients undergoing reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: In a group of high-risk eyes that had already failed at least one subconjunctival filtering surgery, the SIBS microshunt demonstrates reasonable surgical success over 1-year follow-up, with relatively few complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".