Extended Gauss-Newton and ADMM-Gauss-Newton algorithms for low-rank matrix optimization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we develop a variant of the well-known Gauss-Newton (GN) method to solve a class of nonconvex optimization problems involving low-rank matrix variables. As opposed to standard GN method, our algorithm allows one to handle general smooth convex objective function. We show, under mild conditions, that the proposed algorithm globally and locally converges to a stationary point of the original problem. We also show empirically that our GN algorithm achieves higher accurate solutions than the alternating minimization algorithm (AMA). Then, we specify our GN scheme to handle the symmetric case and prove its convergence, where AMA is not applicable. Next, we incorporate our GN scheme into an alternating direction method of multipliers (ADMM) to develop a new variant, called ADMM-GN. We prove that, under mild conditions and a proper choice of the penalty parameter, our ADMM-GN globally converges to a stationary point of the original problem. Finally, we provide several numerical experiments to illustrate the proposed algorithms. Our results show that the new algorithms have encouraging performance compared to existing state-of-the-art methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".