MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

S0472 Epidemiology of Hospitalizations Due to Cyclical Vomiting Syndrome in the United States

2020· article· en· W3093560449 on OpenAlexaff
Achint Patel, Hardikkumar Shah, Mohammed Mustafa Hasan, Harmanpreet Kaur, Yashwitha Sai Pulakurthi, Praneeth Reddy Keesari, Swathy Chirindoth, Uvesh Mansuri, Joseph DePasquale

Bibliographic record

VenueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsBrampton Civic Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineComorbidityLogistic regressionEpidemiologyDiagnosis codeVomitingPediatricsCohortInternal medicineEmergency medicinePopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is a functional gastrointestinal disorder leading to multiple hospitalizations and causes significant impairment to the quality of life. We aim to study the trends, characteristics and outcomes of CVS using a nationwide database. METHODS: We derived a study cohort from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for the years 2008–2017. Hospitalizations due to CVS were identified using International Classification of Diseases (9th/10th Editions) Clinical Modification diagnosis codes (ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM). Comorbidities were also identified by ICD-9/10-CM codes and Elixhauser comorbidity software. Our primary outcome was discharge to the facility following CVS hospitalization. We utilized multivariable survey logistic regression models to analyze the outcomes and identify predictors. RESULTS: A total 229,586 were patients hospitalized due to CVS during the study period. Number of hospitalizations due CVS decreased from 18,032 in 2008 to 17,420 in 2017. Among the hospitalised patients 24% were <18 years, 62% females and 66% caucasians. Mean Length of Stay (LOS) of hospitalized patients was 3.21 ± 0.02 days. Out of total hospitalizations, 5.75% were discharged to facilities and 0.29% died during hospitalization. Furthermore, in multivariable regression analysis, younger age <18 years (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.6–2.5; P < 0.0001), Rural/non-teaching hospital (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.9–2.5; P < 0.001) and Small bed size hospitals (OR 1.4; CI 1.3–1.6; P < 0.0001) and pre existing comorbidities such as Hypothyroidism (OR 1.1; 95% CI 1.0-1.3; P = 0.029), Psychiatric Disorders (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.8–2.6; P < 0.0001) and depression (OR 1.2; 95% CI 1.1–1.4; P = 0.005) were associated with higher odds of discharge to the facility. Moreover in-hospital complications like septicemia, CHF, renal failure, were also associated with poor outcomes. However, patients with private insurance had decreased odds of discharge to a facility. CONCLUSION: We observed that hospitalisations due to CVS have declined over years. We delineated several predictors and comorbidities that have been associated with adverse outcomes, especially in the pediatric population. Efforts to mitigate comorbid conditions and modifiable predictors to reduce healthcare utilization are warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe American Journal of Gastroenterology→Same topicFolate and B Vitamins Research→French-language works237,207→