MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093601190 · doi:10.2118/201269-ms

Vapor-Liquid Equilibria and Diffusion of CO2/<i>n</i>-Decane Mixture in the Nanopores of Shale Reservoirs

2020· article· en· W3093601190 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaohu Dong, Zhongliang Chen, Zhangxin Chen, Jing Wang, Keliu Wu, Ran Li, Li Li

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecaneDiffusionNanoporeThermodynamicsChemistryPhase (matter)Bubble pointMolecular diffusionMass fractionOil shalePhase diagramVapor pressureEquation of stateChemical physicsBubbleMaterials scienceOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyMechanicsPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Numerous laboratory tests on the Northern American shale plays have observed a large number of nanopores. Because of the pore-proximity effect, the vapor-liquid phase equilibrium and transport performance of fluids in nanopores differ significantly from that observed in PVT cell. In recent years, CO2 huff-and-puff has been widely applied to unlock the shale reservoirs. But on account of the high adsorption selectivity of CO2, after the injection of CO2, the original vapor-liquid equilibria of hydrocarbons is changed. The purpose of this study is to predict the phase behavior and diffusion of the CO2/n-decane mixtures in the nanopores. The Peng-Robinson (PR) equation of state is combined with Young-Laplace equation to calculate the phase-composition diagram at the presence of capillary pressure. The equilibrium molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) are also conducted to study the phase behavior, and the number density profiles of different molecules are calculated. Then, based on the discussion of phase behavior, a series of equilibrium MDS runs are carried out to calculate the self-diffusion coefficients of CO2, n-decane, and all fluid molecules. For each MDS with a different CO2 mass fraction, the two types of fluid molecules are thoroughly mixed, the conditions of pore size and temperature are consistent with those in the phase behavior studies. Results indicate that considering the capillary pressure, when the mass fraction of CO2 is less than 40%, the bubble point suppression is more clearly shown in the phase envelope. The number density profiles of n-decane molecules show the apparent characteristics of adsorption layers. As the mass fraction of CO2 molecules increases, the self-diffusion coefficients of CO2, n-decane, and their mixtures all increase. The self-diffusion coefficients of CO2 molecules are higher than that of the n-decane molecules, and the diffusion coefficients of the entire fluid system are somewhere in between. Appropriate CO2 injection into shale oil reservoirs can not only reduce the confinement-induced bubble point suppression but also improve the flow behavior of oil in nanopores. This study can shed some critical insights for the vapor-liquid phase equilibria of confined fluids in nanopores and provide sound guidelines for the application of CO2 huff and puff in shale reservoirs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPE Annual Technical Conference and ExhibitionSame topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207