Medical Tourism: A History and Overview of the Industry and the Case Study of Addiction Recovery in Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the emerging global market in medical tourism. The industry continues to expand and become increasingly profitable with greater popular support. This paper conveys the findings of a literature review on the origins, history and contemporary development of the industry. It explores the rationale and access of the medical tourist, and the purported benefits and costs to involved parties including patients, caregivers, citizens and governments. Ultimately it reveals that this phenomenon leads to lower costs, better care, discretion and leisure benefits to wealthy and mobile international clients while reducing available resources and quality of care for residents of host countries, which are mostly low and middle income countries and potentially costing source countries in aftercare. This paper examines the case study of international treatment for addiction in Spain and analyze two websites advertising the treatment for their use of promotional tactics, the importance of place and the relevance of Wilbert Gesler’s therapeutic landscape concept in marketing services. This reveals that international mobility allows businesses to profit from permissive legal environments and popular therapeutic landscapes abroad.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".