MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A review of drought monitoring using remote sensing and data mining methods

2020· review· en· W3093698868 on OpenAlexaff
Raja Inoubli, Ali Ben Abbes, Imed Riadh Farah, Vijay P. Singh, Tsegaye Tadesse, Mohammad Taghi Sattari

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereview
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Drought Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIdentification (biology)Computer scienceNatural (archaeology)Remote sensingData scienceEnvironmental scienceEnvironmental resource managementGeographyEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Today, drought has become part of the identity as well as the fate of many countries. In fact, drought is considered among the most damaging natural disasters. The severe consequences resulting from drought affect the nature and society at different levels. Proper and efficient management is not possible without accurate prediction of drought and the identification of its various aspects. Thus, the existence of a considerable body of literature on drought monitoring. However, significant growth of remote sensing databases as will an increased amount of available data related to drought have been detected. Therefore, a more adequate approach should be developed. During the past decades, Data Mining (DM) methods have been introduced for drought monitoring. According to the best of our knowledge, a review of drought monitoring using remote sensing data and DM methods is lacking. Thereby, the purpose of this paper is to review and discuss the applications of DM methods. This paper consolidates the finding of drought monitoring, models, tasks, and methodologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.981
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.179
GPT teacher head0.453
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Drought AnalysisFrench-language works237,207