Physiological Benefits of High-intensity Interval Training for Individuals With Parkinson's Disease
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This thesis investigated the effects of high intensity interval training (HIIT) and continuous moderate intensity training (CMIT) on maximal exercise capacity (VO2max), resting and exercising hemodynamics, and clinical symptoms in eighteen men and women with Parkinson’s Disease. Participants were randomized to HIIT (n=9), or CMIT (n=9) groups and completed two pre-training visits. Participants completed clinical questionnaires and performed a progressive exercise test to determine VO2max. Measurements of arterial stiffness and wave reflection characteristics were recorded. Continuous hemodynamic measurements were recorded during a 2-minute isometric handgrip contraction followed by 3-minutes of post-exercise circulatory occlusion. Participants then completed 10 weeks (3x/week; 1 hour/session) of HIIT or CMIT at the Guelph YMCA followed by the same two days of post-testing. HIIT provided clinically relevant improvements in VO2max, UPDRS part III, and BDI-II scores which were greater compared to CMIT. Both exercise protocols provided no improvements in fatigue and resting or exercising hemodynamics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it