MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093801655 · doi:10.1002/ima.22506

Nonparametric variational learning of multivariate beta mixture models in medical applications

2020· article· en· W3093801655 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Imaging Systems and Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Methods and Mixture Models
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceCluster analysisMultivariate statisticsFlexibility (engineering)Machine learningMixture modelArtificial intelligenceField (mathematics)Nonparametric statisticsData miningMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Clustering as an essential technique has matured into a capable solution to address the gap between the growing availability of data and deriving the knowledge from them. In this paper, we propose a novel clustering method “variational learning of infinite multivariate Beta mixture models.” The motivation behind proposing this technique is the flexibility of mixture models to fit the data. This approach has the capability to infer the model complexity and estimate model parameters from the observed data automatically. Moreover, as a label‐free method, it could also address the problem of high costs of medical data labeling, which can be undertaken just by medical experts. The performance of the model is evaluated on real medical applications and compared with other similar alternatives. We demonstrate the ability of our proposed method to outperform widely used methods in the field as it has been shown in experimental results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.951
Threshold uncertainty score0.301

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it