MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093832362

Antecedent moisture conditions and catchment morphology as controls on spatial patterns of runoff generation in small forest catchments

2009· article· en· W3093832362 on OpenAlexaffabout
April L. James, Nigel T. Roulet

Bibliographic record

VenueEGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAntecedent moistureSurface runoffHydrology (agriculture)Environmental scienceDrainage basinStormEphemeral keyWater balanceStreamflowRunoff curve numberGeologyGeographyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Although existing empirical studies of runoff generation in headwater catchments have provided evidence of runoff mechanisms, contributing sources and active flowpaths from forest catchments around the world, our understanding of how hydrologic and biological processes vary and aggregate in space within headwater systems remains poor. In this study, we examine the spatial patterns of storm runoff generation from eight small nested forest catchments ranging in size from 7 to 147 ha, as a function of antecedent moisture conditions and catchment morphology. The catchments, located in the formerly glaciated terrain of Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, Canada, are complex in both their topographic and subsurface characterization. Hydrologic response from the eight catchments shows a strong nonlinear change with antecedent moisture conditions consistent with the hypothesis of different ‘states-of-wetness’. With the transition from wet to dry conditions, local groundwater stores become depleted in some ephemeral catchments, variable source areas shrink and new-water delivered by shallow-subsurface stormflow and the transient development of perched water in valley-bottoms can account for much larger percentages of total runoff (up to 76% of total runoff). For the five storm events, no consistent pattern in percent new-water delivery was observed. However, for the storms observed under dry conditions, larger magnitudes of new water were generated from the three largest catchments attributable to basin morphology, while storms observed under wet conditions exhibited no consistent pattern, with larger variability among the smaller catchments. The results presented here illustrate the complexity of influences of antecedent moisture conditions and catchment morphology on spatial patterns of runoff generation in headwater systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.306
Threshold uncertainty score0.812

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEGU General Assembly Conference AbstractsSame topicHydrology and Watershed Management StudiesFrench-language works237,207