MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3093839536

Optimization and Applications of Slow-Proton-Exchange (SPE) Nuclear Magnetic Resonance pH Sensors

2018· dissertation· W3093839536 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2018
Typedissertation
Language
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNuclear magnetic resonanceProtonChemistryPhysicsNuclear physics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The measurement of pH is ubiquitously important in biochemistry, clinical medicine, and industrial processes. There are still improvements to be made in this field, especially in terms of accuracy, non-invasiveness for biomedical applications and real-time monitoring. Herein, a new series of NMR sensors have been evaluated and applied that employ the Slow-Proton-Exchange (SPE) sensing mechanism. Three sensors, SPE1, SPE2, and TUC, exhibit the SPE phenomenon and thus can be used in unconventional conditions to accurately and reliably quantify pH. The second generation SPE2, optimized from the previous SPE1 with biocompatible pKa and broader operating pH window, has been used to detect real-time pH changes in a series of enzymatic hydrolysis reactions, simulating a metabolic process. All sensors SPE1, SPE2, and TUC have been utilized in DMSO to measure the strengths of organic acids and characterize activity, expanding the application scope from aqueous to organic solvents.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→