Home is where the female is: Analysing the geography of gender inequalities and the home
Bibliographic record
Abstract

 
 
 Discourses on the home as a physicality often recount on romantic or nostalgic notions such as safety, comfort, and identity. Home as a defined boundary from the public realm and as a private space can be conceptualised as a gendered landscape, in which women are confined to roles involving reproductive and domestic labor. Thus, in a paradoxical sense, although home is socially constructed to fit ideals and create a space of material safety, it can also create a geography of difference in terms of women and the systemic barriers that can lead to violence against women, such as domestic or familial violence. This paper discusses the geography of the home and its physical and social attributes as it intersects with gender inequalities. Moreover, an intersectional and focused analysis on how domestic violence can occur because of gendered perceptions in the home is provided. This introductory research paper examines existing literature and can add to the limited research in domestic violence against women. Thus, the paper may be used to inform future housing policy such that a more comprehensive approach which includes domestic violence perspectives are considered.
 
 
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".