INNOVATIONS TO TOPICAL THERAPY OF ROSACEA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main pathogenetic aspects of rosacea, various classifications of dermatosis and the modern clinical classification are presented. The symptoms that differentiate rosacea from other dermatoses are described. Contradictory of modern scientific concepts of different researchers, approaches to etiology, pathogenesis and treatment has been noted. The social significance of rosacea, the importance and possibility of eliminating the symptoms of the disease at early stages, the achievement and prolongation of remission are shown. The main triggers for the manifestation of rosacea, which should be taken into account to achieve the maximum effect in the treatment of the disease, are indicated. The domestic and foreign clinical recommendations on the treatment of the disease are considered in view of the appearance of new external drugs. The results of several studies in the USA and Canada on the efficacy of 1% ivermectin cream and 0.5% brimonidine tartrate gel compared to placebo are shown. The first domestic positive experience of self-study with 1% ivermectin cream (Solantra®) and 0.5% brimonidine tartrate gel (Mirvazo Derm®) is presented. The high efficacy and very good tolerability of this drugs, as well as the absence of any side effects in patients with moderate to severe rosacea are shown.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".