MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3093930159 · doi:10.1080/2150704x.2020.1825869

Classifying open water features using optical satellite imagery and an object-oriented convolutional neural network

2020· article· en· W3093930159 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Merchant

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing Letters · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsDucks Unlimited Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvolutional neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceSatellite imageryThresholdingPattern recognition (psychology)Deep learningSatelliteSegmentationRangingRandom forestRemote sensingSupport vector machineImage (mathematics)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, Sentinel-2 optical satellite imagery was acquired over the Peace Athabasca Delta and assessed for its open water classification capabilities using an object-oriented deep learning algorithm . The workflow involved segmenting the satellite data into meaningful image objects, building a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), training the CNN, and lastly applying the CNN, resulting in probability heat maps of open water (with score values ranging from 0–1). Using the vector segmentation, heat maps were then iteratively assigned final class labels (‘open water’ or ‘other’) based on various probability thresholding. The ensuing open water classifications were assessed against a large validation dataset, and a highest overall accuracy of 96.2% (0.912 kappa coefficient) was achieved, with an open water producer’s accuracy of 98.1%. These results were then compared against a Random Forest (RF) classification, and results indicated that the CNN algorithm outperforms RF in this study site. Additionally, an important component of this study was the optimization of several CNN configurations, including patch size and learning rate; the latter which plays a critical role in model adaptation. The optimized object-oriented CNN and associated results can be used to provide resource managers with accurate surface water extent maps at 10 m resolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote Sensing LettersSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207