Genetic interaction analysis in microbial pathogens: unravelling networks of pathogenesis, antimicrobial susceptibility and host interactions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic interaction (GI) analysis is a powerful genetic strategy that analyzes the fitness and phenotypes of single- and double-gene mutant cells in order to dissect the epistatic interactions between genes, categorize genes into biological pathways, and characterize genes of unknown function. GI analysis has been extensively employed in model organisms for foundational, systems-level assessment of the epistatic interactions between genes. More recently, GI analysis has been applied to microbial pathogens and has been instrumental for the study of clinically important infectious organisms. Here, we review recent advances in systems-level GI analysis of diverse microbial pathogens, including bacterial and fungal species. We focus on important applications of GI analysis across pathogens, including GI analysis as a means to decipher complex genetic networks regulating microbial virulence, antimicrobial drug resistance and host-pathogen dynamics, and GI analysis as an approach to uncover novel targets for combination antimicrobial therapeutics. Together, this review bridges our understanding of GI analysis and complex genetic networks, with applications to diverse microbial pathogens, to further our understanding of virulence, the use of antimicrobial therapeutics and host-pathogen interactions. .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".