MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Design, by Physical Topology Optimizing, of a Passive UHF RFID Identification System: Suitable for Applications with Various Constraints

2020· article· en· W3093967108 on OpenAlexaff
Rahma Zayoud, Habib Hamam

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRFID technology advancements
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Moncton
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUltra high frequencyComputer scienceRadio-frequency identificationServomotorSimulated annealingTopology (electrical circuits)Electronic engineeringEmbedded systemComputer hardwareEngineeringElectrical engineeringAlgorithmTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RFID technology is booming. It catches the attention of several researchers. This technology uses the radio wave to identify objects on which an RFID tag is placed. RFID has a lot of advantages, but it also has limitations. Its limits are its sensitivity to liquids, metals and speed. We design an objects identification system by radio frequency that works in different RFID technology application environments, based on passive UHF RFID technology and through the physical topology optimization in real time too. This system is also adapted to various constraints, in order to solve overcome difficulties, related to various applications, at once, and operates, without any problem, in different fields. We use the simulated annealing algorithm to find the optimal physical topology that has the highest average reading rate. RFID antennas are installed on brackets, attached to a tripod system by servo motors. These servo motors are controlled by the middleware, where the simulated annealing optimization algorithm is already implemented, to vary the angles of the detection connectors in an automated way, in order to find the optimal topology. So the optimization process will be guided by an optimization algorithm and not by trial and error processes. Tripod mechanical systems are movable media for antennas to play on XYZ dimensions too. The design of the mechanical system and the choice of materials were made. The first results, such as the identity of each detected object and the identity of each antenna that will detect an object, are here. Following reached results will be shared in several next publications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.975
Threshold uncertainty score0.304

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRFID technology advancementsFrench-language works237,207