ULTRAPHONOPHORESIS OF ENZYME DRUGS IN TREATMENT OF POSTACNE SCARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most effective medication for aesthetic correction of skin scars is ultraphonophoresis of enzyme preparations. Under our supervision there were 20 patients aged 17.2 ± 2.4 years with a symptomatic complex who received a course of ultraphonophoresis of hyaluronidase cream (15 procedures performed every other day). Efficacy was assessed taking into account clinical high-grade indices: Vancouver scale, POSAS, Dermatological Life Quality Index. Efficacy according to the Vancouver scale was 100% for pain, itching decreased by 75% after 2 months and completely stopped after 6 months, color of the scar improved by 50%, stiffness decreased by 67%, thickness of scar deformation decreased by 50%. Ultraphonophoresis of hyaluronidase cream is a highly effective method of correction of the scars of the symptom complex postacne, which also determines the improvement in the quality of life of this category of patients according to the dynamics of the dermatological quality of life index. This method can be recommended for use in clinical practice.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".