Analysis and modelling on coring process of deep‐sea gravity piston corer
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Taken the deep‐sea gravity‐piston corer as the prototype, a model of the corer penetrating was built based on energy conservation and by analysing the coring process. The effects of influencing parameters of the deep‐sea gravity‐piston corer on the penetration process and coring length were analysed. In addition, a comparison between the calculated values and the real examples was performed. The results show that corer weight, sediment properties and penetration velocity affect the coring performance. The penetration depth significantly increases with an increase in corer weight, and the corer weight plays an important role in the process of the corer penetrating. Moreover, the penetration depth decreases with the friction coefficient of increasing sediment, while it gradually increases with an increase in penetration velocity. It is also revealed that the penetration depth decreases approximately linearly as the core barrel diameter. Consequently, these will provide the basic data for the design and optimisation of deep‐water gravity‐piston corer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it