Receptor GPR91 contributes to voiding function and detrusor relaxation mediated by succinate
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: Succinate activates the receptor GPR91 identified in the bladder. The present study aims to unravel the mechanisms of bladder relaxation by succinate and how the receptor is involved in structural and functional changes of the bladder. METHODS: mice, and Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. GPR91 expression was confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and tissue morphology was examined by light (Masson trichrome) and fluorescence microscopy. Nitric oxide (NO) and ATP secretion were measured. RESULTS: Bladders of GPR91 KO mice had a greater mass to body weight ratio with a thicker bladder wall compared to C57BL/6 mice. They also displayed increased basal and maximal bladder pressures, and decreased intercontraction intervals, bladder capacity, micturition volume, and compliance. During cystometry, bladders of SD rats and C57BL/6 mice instilled with succinate (10 mM) showed signs of relaxation while bladders of GPR91 KO mice were unresponsive. Similarly, in organ bath, succinate relaxed bladder strips preincubated with carbachol, except GPR91 KO ones. Relaxation was stronger in the presence of urothelium and independent of NO synthesis. Bladder strips from all mice groups showed similar responses to KCl, carbachol, and electrical stimulation. In vitro, succinate increased NO secretion in urothelial cell culture of both C57BL6 and GPR91 KO mice while ATP secretion was potently decreased by succinate in C57BL6 culture only. CONCLUSION: Succinate through GPR91 is essential to bladder structure and contraction. GPR91 relaxes the detrusor partially by decreasing urothelial ATP secretion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".