MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094002855 · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.3023225

Editorial: Blockchain Ecosystem—Technological and Management Opportunities and Challenges

2020· editorial· en· W3094002855 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · 2020
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlockchain Technology Applications and Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlockchainInternet of ThingsSupply chainSupply chain managementBusinessThe InternetComputer scienceEngineering managementEngineeringComputer securityMarketingWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Blockchain is increasingly deployed in a broad range of sectors, ranging from banking and finance to manufacturing to energy to transportation, and so on. While many technological and business related blockchain developments and challenges have been identified, many of these engineering and management challenges have not been addressed. The ongoing interest in this topic is also partly evidenced by the large number of submissions we received in this special issue. Of the 200 submissions, only 39 articles were eventually accepted after several rounds of rigorous reviews (i.e., acceptance rate of 19.5%). In this editorial, we report on the findings from the first 36 articles on a broad range of topics (e.g., supply chain, financial technology, Internet of Things, smart city, healthcare, security, privacy, and blockchain building blocks such as consensus algorithms). Hopefully, the findings reported in these 36 accepted articles will provide sustainable solutions for existing and future blockchain systems and platforms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.465
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it