Future Snow Water Equivalent and Snowmelt Extremes from NA-CORDEX Ensembles
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Snowpack and snowmelt driven extreme events can have large societal and economic consequences. Extreme snow can damage infrastructure and buildings. Snow meltwater is a dominant driver of severe spring flooding in the north-central and -eastern U.S. and southern Canada with impacts to the built and natural environments. However, the currently there is very limited guidance regarding the magnitude of “future” snow-driven extremes in a changing climate as needed to plan, design, and manage potentially vulnerable infrastructure and ecosystems. Regional climate models (RCMs) are commonly used to study and quantify regional climate changes, even though the ability of these models to accurately represent snow varies. In this study, trends and designs of extreme 25- and 100-year snowpack (snow water equivalent; SWE) and snowmelt events are estimated in the mid and late 21st century using the North America - Coordinated Regional Climate Downscaling Experiment (NA-CORDEX) ensemble of RCMs under Representative Con-centration Pathways 8.5 (RCP 8.5). This study aims to answer the following three research questions: How much will snow-driven extreme events be changed in the mid and late 21st century? Which regions have the largest differences among models? Which RCM models are the source of these regional uncertainties?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".