Dysregulated gene expression of imprinted and X-linked genes: a link to poor development of bovine haploid androgenetic embryos
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Mammalian uniparental embryos are efficient models for genome imprinting research and allow studies on the contribution of the paternal and maternal genome to early embryonic development. In this study, we analyzed different methodologies for production of bovine haploid androgenetic embryos (hAE) to elucidate the causes behind their poor developmental potential. The results showed that hAE can be efficiently generated by using intracytoplasmic sperm injection and oocyte enucleation at telophase II. Although haploidy does not disturb early development up to around the 3 rd mitotic division, androgenetic development is disturbed after the time of zygote genome activation those that reach the morula stage are less capable to become a blastocyst. Analysis of gene expression indicated abnormal levels of methyltransferase 3B and key long non-coding RNAs involved in X-chromosome inactivation and genomic imprinting of the KCNQ1 locus, which is associated to the methylation status of imprinted control regions of XIST and KCNQ1OT1. Thus, our results seem to exclude micromanipulation consequences and chromosomal abnormalities as major factors in developmental restriction, suggesting that their early developmental constraint is regulated at an epigenetic level.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".