MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094100206 · doi:10.3390/electronics9111753

Real-Time Remote Health Monitoring System Driven by 5G MEC-IoT

2020· article· en· W3094100206 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie SupérieureUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCloud computingTelemedicineComputer scienceEdge computingInternet of ThingsBig dataLow latency (capital markets)Enhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionHealth careReal-time computingComputer networkTelecommunicationsComputer securityData miningOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Telemedicine over Internet of Things (IoT) generates an unprecedented amount of data, which further requires transmission, analysis, and storage. Deploying cloud computing to handle data of this magnitude will introduce unacceptable data analysis latency and high storage costs. Thus, mobile edge computing (MEC) deployed between the cloud and users, which is close to the nodes of data generation, can tackle these problems in 5G scenarios with the help of artificial intelligence. This paper proposes a telemedicine system based on MEC and artificial intelligence for remote health monitoring and automatic disease diagnosis. The integration of different technologies such as computers, medicine, and telecommunications will significantly improve the efficiency of patient treatment and reduce the cost of health care.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it