MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Beef veins record fluid overpressure during oil primary migration in source rocks

2020· article· en· W3094109254 on OpenAlexaff
Miao Wang, Yong Chen, Matthew Steele‐MacInnis

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFluid inclusionsGeologyOverpressureCalciteHydrocarbonGeochemistrySource rockInclusion (mineral)StyloliteVeinPetroleumMineralogyPetrographyPetrologyStructural basinChemistryGeomorphologyQuartzPaleontology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bedding-parallel, fibrous calcite veins (commonly referred to as “beefs”) are widely developed within Eocene, lacustrine, laminated organic-rich source rocks in the Dongying Depression, Bohai Bay Basin, East China. Based on the study of vein petrography and fluid inclusions features, we demonstrate the vein was the product of hydrocarbon generation and expulsion from organic-rich shales. Consequently, the primary inclusions in the fibrous calcites recorded the fluid conditions during maturation of these source rocks. In most cases, the calcite-hosted primary inclusion assemblages are composed of the two-phase (oil + gas) hydrocarbon inclusions, with or without coexisting aqueous inclusions. Less commonly, the assemblages are made up of inclusions with only liquid hydrocarbon (i.e., monophase, high-density petroleum inclusions). In addition, many bitumen-bearing oil inclusions could also be observed in the fibrous calcite veins. By modelling the isochores of two-phase oil inclusions and coexisting aqueous inclusions, in light of the burial history for the basin, we conclude the fluid overpressure up to approximately twice (2x) the hydrostatic value (i.e., ~0.5–0.6x lithostatic) are the most common during the hydrocarbon generation and primary migration. The highest degrees of overpressure are recorded by the rare monophase petroleum inclusions. The resulting isochores of these highest density inclusions project to pressures that overlap with the lithostatic gradient. Thus, the monophase inclusions indicate pressures approaching and in some cases exceeding lithostatic. Our results indicate that fluids present during hydrocarbon generation and expulsion in organic-rich shales were indeed overpressured, but that lithostatic pressures were not the norm and evidently not a prerequisite for vein dilation, which means the fluid pressures during dilation of horizontal veins are not necessarily equal to the overburden throughout the history of the opening. This suggests that at least some of the vein dilation is accommodated and offset by concomitant narrowing of the adjacent wall rock laminae, likely by scavenging (dissolution/reprecipitation) of CaCO3 from the adjacent wall rock, owing to the positive pressure dependence of calcite solubility, and presence of organic acids as byproducts of hydrocarbon generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis→French-language works237,207→