<b>Zwischen Putin und Trump:</b>Orbáns illiberale Demokratie und das Spektakel des Sports in Ostmitteleuropa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zusammenfassung Wie schaffen es illiberale Politiker, mit einer Politik gewählt zu werden, die gegen die Interessen ihrer Wähler verstößt? Eine mögliche Antwort ist, dass sie Spektakel als Ersatz für Debatten und politische Auseinandersetzung bieten. Mit den Arbeiten von Roland Barthes zu Mythologie und von Guy Debords zu Spektakeln argumentiere ich, dass für illiberale Führungsspitzen wie Putin, Trump und Orbán das Spektakel des Sports dazu dient, die Debattenkultur in der praktischen Politik zu übertünchen. Orbáns Variante dieser Spektakel ist von besonderem Interesse für den europäischen Kontext, da sie aufzeigt, wie die illiberale Beseitigung einer Debattenkultur innerhalb der Regelwerke und Vorgaben der Europäischen Union möglich wird.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".