MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3094159433 · doi:10.1080/21681163.2020.1835542

Improving central line needle insertions using <i>in-situ</i> vascular reconstructions

2020· article· en· W3094159433 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComputer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering Imaging & Visualization · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchOntario Research Foundation
Keywords3D ultrasoundImaging phantomMedicineUltrasoundInternal jugular veinBiomedical engineeringRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We developed a neck central line insertion guidance system that renders 3D ultrasound (US) surface reconstructions of the carotid artery (CA) and internal jugular vein (IJV), a tracked model of the needle, and needle trajectory on a 2D monitor. Twenty clinicians evaluated this system compared to US-only guidance on a phantom using time and insertion accuracy metrics. The 3D system had a 100% success rate compared to 70% for the US-only system. The average distance from the centre line of the US reconstructed IJV was 1.8±0.9 mm under 3D guidance compared to 4.2±2.9 mm for US-only. Our system significantly improved needle insertion success rates and targeting accuracy compared to the US-only approach through a radiation-free surface reconstruction of the neck vascular structures. This work has the potential to provide a mobile 3D imaging and visualisation system for needle-based vascular interventions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.856

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.335 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it