THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A NEODYMIUM (1064 NM) LASER AND FRACTIONAL PHOTOTHERMOLYSIS FOR THE CORRECTION OF THE ATROPHIC SCARS
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One of the challenging problems for modern cosmetology is the cosmetic correction of the cutaneous scars of the skin that arises in the first place from the high prevalence of this condition and the lack of reliable and safe methods for its treatment The application of laser technologies including selective laser therapy as the method of fractional photothermolysis and the use of a neodymium (1064 nm) laser is considered to be a promising approach to address this problem. The present study included 18 patients presenting with hormone-dependent atrophic scars. All the patients were assigned for the treatment by selective photothermolysis (at the rate of 2 sessions per each treatment course performed with a 4 week interval) and irradiation by the neodymium laser (at the rate of 6-8 sessions conducted after fractional photothermolysis). The use of combined laser therapy in patients with hormone-dependent atrophic scars produced a pronounced effect as evidenced by the improvement of the clinical picture and was accompanied by the 78.1% reduction of the symptom index according to the DISC symptom scale and the 76.5% improvement of the dermatology life quality index (DLQI). The use of the combined method for the correction of atrophic cutaneous scars helps to restore the epidermal-dermal and epidermal structures of the skin in the association with the 1.4-fold, 1.7-fold, and 1.6-fold increase in the thickness of the epidermis, dermis, and hypodermis respectively; simultaneously, the acoustic density of the tissues increased by 1.8 times which corresponded to the improvement of the ultrasound picture by almost 75% when estimated in accordance with the Vancouver scar scale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".